St.
Paul’s Parish
(Episcopal/Anglican)
Riverside,
Illinois
|
He will send His
angel before you
~Genesis
24
ANGELS
The concept of
angels can be vaguely
uncomfortable for some Anglicans, even though a 2003 Fox News/Opinion
Dynamic
poll found that 78% of Americans believe in them. Roman Catholics
have given far more thought and study to them than we, and the
literature
reflects that. The syrupy presentations sometimes seen on
greeting
cards or television has not helped the situation, and often the
representations
are completely unsupported by Scripture or reason. There is, for
example, no Littlest Angel, and there never will be.
We don't know a
whole lot about
angels, but what we do know comes from the Bible, mostly through St.
Thomas
Aquinas. He gave a great deal of study to angels and is sometimes
called the Angelic Doctor.
Angels are God's
messengers and
our companions in the way. Your guardian angel will incline your
heart. If you learn how to listen, your life will be easier and
richer.
Some quick facts:
You don’t need to know anything
about angels for
salvation. |
All you need is the knowledge and
love of God through Jesus Christ. Like the saints, angels are
there
to help that process along and will do so whether you acknowledge them
or not. |
| Everybody has a guardian angel. |
This comes from Jesus himself,
in Matthew 18:10. It is also something that the Church has always
taught. Silently acknowledging the presence of each person's
guardian
angel can change the way you look at the world and other people. |
| Angels are not cute and cuddly. |
They’re immensely powerful, and
fearsome when they allow themselves to be seen. Notice when they
appear in the Bible,
they usually
say “Fear not.”
Still, the good ones are full of boundless love and kindness. |
| Angels don’t have wings. |
They have no bodies, so have no
more need of wings than they do of a bicycle. Wings are merely an
artistic convention to denote their ethereal nature, but if it helps
you
to think about them with wings, that’s okay. |
| We don't become angels when we
die. |
People and angels are two different
species. You will never be an angel, but, mercifully, you will
never
be a cockroach either. |
| Some angels are good, some are
bad. |
In the end, the bad angels (demons)
will lose, but that won’t stop them from winning some battles along the
way. Make sure you know which angel is inspiring your
actions;
it can be hard world out there. |
| There are more angels than people. |
Every person has a guardian
angel.
Add to that the legions of cherubim, seraphim, thrones, and other
orders,
and evil angels (demons). Humans are a minority in God's world. |
| Angels have the power of bilocation. |
Wherever they are sent by God,
they also remain simultaneously in His presence, face-to-face. If
you ever find yourself touched by an angel, just think how close
to God you are at that time. |
Some angel books in St. Paul's Library:
Atemose,
Charlene
What
You Should Know about Angels.
Liguori,
1996, 85 p.
If the author's
credentials as a nun are to be listed on the back cover of this book, the reader
is entitled to believe they will be made manifest in the work. Mostly one is given
the author's tepid personal and sentimental speculations about angels. These are
neither inspiring nor authoritative. She makes occasional biblical references, but
does not quote the actual verses. Since the title is What you should know about
angels, one can conclude that the author feels we should know very little, because
that is what is to be found between the covers. If you seek some spiritual cheer
leading about angels, read Billy Graham’s Angels: God’s secret agents, which despite
the hokey subtitle, has some fire and grit.
*****
|
Graham,
Billy
Angels:
God’s Secret Agents.
Guideposts,
1975, 175p.
If you
subscribe to the notion that,
ultimately, Christianity is caught, not taught, then there may be
something
for you in this book. The scholarship may be a bit weak, but
Graham
has a gift for conveying his enthusiasm and love for God and the
angels.
Nothing wrong with that, even for Anglicans. Half the verbiage
would have sufficed, but that wouldn't
have been enough to publish as a book, or at least garner that sales
that
they did with this format. Graham gives biblical quotes so you
can
relate them to his message, but he quotes from many different
translations
of the Bible. This is playing games with words in
translation,
and The Rev. Dr. Billy ought to know better. There can be a
profound difference
between mere words, and The Word. Like the Rio Grande, this book
is a mile wide and an inch deep. For all that, it's a fairly good
inch in its own particular niche, and Billy's an entertaining preacher.
*****
|
Huber,
Georges
My
Angel Will Go before You.
Christian
Classics: Allen, Texas;
1995, 128 p.
[Translated
from the French]
This slim
volume was written by
a Roman Catholic for his confreres and is prone to all the faults one
associates
with that. Statements such as the Roman Catholic Church being
“the
reliable interpreter of Revelation,” or “no Catholic with clear ideas
would
deny that angels exist,” can be offputting to Anglicans who bridle at
such
bland statements of authority. Further, this book is written as a
“defense,” which can be a tiresome form in the best of hands.
Still,
just when you're rolling your eyes and ready to put it down in
exasperation,
a provocative statement will lift itself off the page and give you
cause
for profitable reflection. Did you ever consider communication
between
guardian angels as an explanation of love at first sight? That a
blessing or consecration by the Church places an object under the
protection
of a guardian angel? That angels gather up your prayers and
present
them up to God? If you're only going to read one book on angels,
read Peter Kreeft’s Angels and demons: What do we really know about
them?, which is a good deal more thorough and reasoned. My
angel
will go before you can provide additional insights, but you should
feel free to skim until you come to the good parts.
*****
|
Kreeft,
Peter
Angels
and Demons: What do We Really Know about Them?
Ignatius,
1995, 154p.
If you're
only going to read one
book on angels, this is the one. Orderly, tightly reasoned,
methodical,
and succinct, it quotes the Bible and Church Fathers, and explains the
reasoning of theologians for why the Church believes as it does.
It is hard to put down. But take note, it seems that the popular
image of a guardian angel sitting on one shoulder encouraging you to do
right, and a devil sitting on the other shoulder tempting you to do
wrong
is not far off the mark. Kreeft has a gift for clear convincing
exposition,
and at times it is easy to see his good angel is guiding his pen.
At other times, the devil grabs him like Turette’s syndrome and makes
him
blurt out knee-jerk romanisms that will put your Anglican back
up.
After winning you over with reason, he may suddenly say that you don't
have to buy his argument anyway since the Roman Catholic Church tells
you
that it is so, and you must accept it if you are to call yourself a
[Roman]
Catholic. Puh-leez! Worse, he sneaks in gratuitous comments
about that great Roman Catholic bête noire, abortion. Under
that felicity of expression, that erudition, and that scholarship one
gets
glimpses of a strident stiff-necked fundamentalist banging on the
pulpit
and telling you that you'd better damn well believe what he says or
you're
going straight to hell. Which Peter Kreeft do you believe?
Dear Reader, avoid the whispered advice of the demon, and hear your
guardian
angel. Sort the wheat from the chaff, for there far more of the
former
than the latter.
*****
A little
editing would make it ***** and a classic of angelology.
|
|
|
|